CarpeDiem IAS • CarpeDiem IAS • CarpeDiem IAS •

Ethanol Blending in India – Current Debate and Policy

09 Aug 2025 GS 3 Environment
Ethanol Blending in India – Current Debate and Policy Click to view full image

Background

  • Ethanol Blending Programme (EBP) launched in 2003, with major push under the National Policy on Biofuels (2018).

  • Objective: Reduce crude oil import dependency, cut carbon emissions, boost farmers’ income by using sugarcane, damaged foodgrains, and agricultural residue for ethanol production.

  • Targets:

    • 20% blending by 2025–26 (advanced from 2030).

    • Achieved 12% blending in 2023–24.

  • Like ethanol, India will adopt a phased approach to SAF adoption. A blending mandate has already been initiated, with a target of 1% blending for international flights by 2027, increasing to 2% by 2028, and scaling further as supply stabilizes.
Recent Controversy
  • Claim: Ethanol-blended petrol may reduce vehicular efficiency (fuel economy) and could harm engines.

  • Government Response:

    • Petroleum Minister Hardeep Singh Puri termed it a "vilification campaign" driven by vested economic interests.

    • Drew parallel to earlier skepticism when Compressed Biogas (CBG) was introduced.

    • Called for trust in Indian farmers and biomass-based energy sources.

  • Industry Backing: Indian Sugar and Bio-Energy Manufacturers Association says ethanol blending is:

    • Scientifically validated and globally proven.

    • Strategically important for energy security.

    • A driver for farmers’ welfare.

Scientific & Economic Rationale
  • Fuel Efficiency Impact: Studies by ARAI & global benchmarks (US, Brazil) show only marginal reduction (1–2%) in mileage with 20% blending, often offset by cleaner combustion and lower maintenance.

  • Emission Reduction:

    • Ethanol burns cleaner, reducing CO, hydrocarbons, and particulate matter.

    • Lifecycle GHG emissions can be up to 50–60% lower compared to petrol.

  • Economic Benefits:

    • Saves ₹40,000 crore annually in oil import bills at 20% blending.

    • Boosts rural economy via purchase of surplus sugarcane, maize, damaged grains.

Challenges & Criticism
  • Feedstock Dependence: Heavy reliance on sugarcane raises water-use concerns.

  • Price & Supply Stability: Fluctuations in agricultural output affect ethanol supply.

  • Technology Upgradation: Vehicles must be optimised for E20 and higher blends to avoid corrosion or reduced efficiency.

  • Food vs Fuel Debate: Diversion of foodgrains in drought years could cause price spikes.

Global Examples
  • Brazil: Over 85% of new cars are flex-fuel compatible; ethanol blending >27%.

  • US: E10 and E15 blends are common; incentivised through Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS).

  • Thailand & Philippines: Actively pursuing E20–E85 blends.



← Back to list