CarpeDiem IAS • CarpeDiem IAS • CarpeDiem IAS •

Forest Rights Titles

14 Aug 2025 GS 3 Environment
Forest Rights Titles Click to view full image

Context: Chhattisgarh Govt. Cuts Thousands of Forest Rights Titles

Background

  • Forest Rights Act (FRA), 2006: Recognises and vests rights to use forest land for Scheduled Tribes (STs) and other traditional forest-dwelling communities.

  • Grants Individual Forest Rights (IFR) and Community Forest Resource Rights (CFRR) titles.

  • Purpose: Ensure livelihood, residence, and resource access for forest-dependent communities.

Recent Developments 

  • RTI data  shows thousands of forest rights titles missing from Chhattisgarh govt. records over the last 17 months.

  • State claim: Reductions due to “miscommunication” and reporting errors, not title withdrawal.

Key Data Points

  • State Total (May 2025):

    • 4.82 lakh IFR titles distributed across 30 districts.

    • 4,396 CFRR titles distributed.

  • District-level Reductions:

    • Bastar: IFR titles fell from 37,958 (Jan 2024)35,180 (May 2025).

    • Rajnandgaon: CFRR titles dropped from 40 to 20 in one month (2024).

    • Bijapur: CFRR titles fell from 299 (Mar 2024)297 (Apr 2024).

  • FRA Implementation Gaps:

    • Not implemented in Raipur, Durg, Bemetara.

    • Chhattisgarh accounts for 43% of India’s forest area under FRA titles (as of May 2025).

    • Slow progress in 3 districts recently declared free of Naxalism.

Legal Context

  • FRA, 2006 has no provision for withdrawing titles once granted.

  • Any reduction in titles is considered an “anomaly” by researchers and experts.

Possible Reasons for Reductions

  • Official stance:

    • Errors in gram sabha → sub-divisional → district-level data compilation.

    • Corrections done in progress reports to fix inflated figures.

  • Expert suspicion:

    • Could indicate procedural lapses or irregularities in FRA implementation.

Implications

  • Administrative credibility questioned in FRA implementation.

  • Potential loss of trust among forest-dwelling communities.

  • Could affect livelihoods dependent on recognised forest rights.

  • Raises concerns about data transparency and monitoring under FRA



← Back to list