CarpeDiem IAS • CarpeDiem IAS • CarpeDiem IAS •

India invited to Trump’s “Board of Peace”

19 Jan 2026 GS 2 International Relations
India invited to Trump’s “Board of Peace” Click to view full image

What is the Board of Peace?

  • A proposed international body under a peace plan for Gaza, originally announced in September 2025.

  • Concept:

    • Gaza to be governed by a technocratic, apolitical Palestinian committee

    • Supervised by an international body called the Board of Peace

  • Chair:

    • Donald Trump (personally, not as an office-holder)

Evolution of the idea

Original version (UN-approved)

  • Approved by the United Nations in November 2025

  • Mandate:

    • Limited to Gaza

    • Temporary (till end of 2027)

  • No provision for:

    • Permanent membership

    • Global conflict resolution

Current version (as per Charter sent to India)

  • Envisioned as:

    • A new International Organization

    • A “Transitional Governing Administration”

  • Scope expanded:

    • Not limited to Gaza

    • Aims to resolve global conflicts

  • Does not explicitly mention Gaza in the Charter

  • Seen by critics as a “parallel UN”

Membership details

  • Invitations sent to ~60 countries

  • Invitees include:

    • Hungary, Albania, Greece, Canada, Turkey, Cyprus

    • Egypt, Jordan, Paraguay, Argentina

    • Pakistan (earlier), India (January 2026)

  • Membership terms:

    • 3-year tenure, OR

    • Permanent membership by paying $1 billion in the first year

Leadership and governance concerns

Chairmanship

  • Charter states:

    • Donald Trump is inaugural Chairman

    • Continues as Chairman even if he is not US President

  • Removal of Chairman:

    • Only by voluntary resignation, or

    • Unanimous vote of an Executive Board dominated by his appointees

    • Successor to be designated by Trump himself

➡ Raises serious issues of accountability and institutional independence

Executive Board – Founding members

  • Marco Rubio

  • Steve Witkoff

  • Jared Kushner

  • Tony Blair

  • Marc Rowan (US businessman)

  • Ajay Banga

  • Robert Gabriel (US National Security Adviser)

Why is it controversial?

Sovereignty concerns

  • Member countries must:

    • Consent to be bound by the Charter

  • Accepting means:

    • A sovereign state joins an organisation permanently chaired by an individual

    • Even when that individual holds no constitutional office

UN bypass issue

  • Trump has:

    • Publicly criticised the UN

    • Cut US funding to UN bodies

  • Board of Peace:

    • Mimics UN-style charter (13 Articles)

    • Has provisions on membership, funding, dispute resolution

  • Perception:

    • Attempt to bypass or undermine the UN Security Council

Mandate ambiguity

  • Charter empowers Board to act in regions:

    • “Affected by conflict”

    • “Threatened by conflict” (undefined)

  • Risk:

    • Overreach into sovereign affairs

    • Subjective interpretation of “threat”

India-specific dilemmas

  • Accepting invite raises questions on:

    • Strategic autonomy

    • Commitment to UN-led multilateralism

    • Precedent of pay-to-be-permanent member

  • India traditionally supports:

    • UN reform, not replacement

    • Sovereignty and non-intervention

International response

  • Hungary: First country to announce acceptance

  • Others: Still evaluating

  • Human rights groups:

    • Compare the structure to colonial trusteeship

  • Scholars:

    • Call it “Trump’s new UN”

Prelims Practice MCQs

Q. The “Board of Peace”, recently in the news, was originally proposed in the context of:

(a) Ukraine–Russia conflict
(b) Afghanistan’s political transition
(c) Post-conflict governance of Gaza
(d) UN reform negotiations

Correct answer: (c)

Explanation:

  • The Board of Peace was proposed under a Gaza peace plan, envisaging temporary transitional governance after a ceasefire.

Q. With reference to the Board of Peace, consider the following statements:

  1. It was initially approved by the United Nations with a limited mandate.

  2. Its original mandate was restricted to Gaza and time-bound.

  3. Permanent membership was part of the original UN-approved plan.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

(a) 1 and 2 only
(b) 2 and 3 only
(c) 1 and 3 only
(d) 1, 2 and 3

Correct answer: (a)

Explanation:

  • Statements 1 and 2 are correct.

  • Statement 3 is incorrect: Permanent membership did not exist in the original plan.

Q. Consider the following individuals:

  1. Marco Rubio

  2. Tony Blair

  3. Ajay Banga

  4. António Guterres

Which of the above are founding Executive Board members of the Board of Peace?

(a) 1, 2 and 3 only
(b) 1 and 4 only
(c) 2 and 4 only
(d) 1, 2, 3 and 4

Correct answer: (a)

Explanation:

  • Marco Rubio, Tony Blair, and Ajay Banga are listed members.

  • António Guterres is the UN Secretary-General and not part of the Board.



← Back to list