CarpeDiem IAS • CarpeDiem IAS • CarpeDiem IAS •

Raj Kumar Goyal Takes Oath as Chief Information Commissioner

16 Dec 2025 GS 2 Polity
Raj Kumar Goyal Takes Oath as Chief Information Commissioner Click to view full image

What is the news?

  • Raj Kumar Goyal, former IAS officer, was sworn in as the Chief Information Commissioner (CIC).

  • Oath administered by: President Droupadi Murmu.

  • After assuming charge, the CIC administered oath to 8 new Information Commissioners.

  • With these appointments, the Central Information Commission now has its full sanctioned strength for the first time in nine years.

Central Information Commission (CIC)

Constitution & Legal Basis

  • Established under the Right to Information Act, 2005.

  • It is a statutory body (not constitutional).

Legal Basis

  • Section 12 of the Right to Information Act, 2005 provides for the establishment of the Central Information Commission (CIC).

  • Objective: Effective implementation of the Right to Information and enhancement of transparency and accountability in public authorities.

Composition (Section 12)

  • One Chief Information Commissioner (CIC)

  • Not more than ten Information Commissioners (ICs)

  • Total maximum strength = 11 members

Appointment

  • Appointed by the President of India.

  • On recommendation of a committee consisting of:

    • Prime Minister (Chairperson)

    • Leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha

    • Union Cabinet Minister nominated by PM

Tenure

  • Term: 3 years or till 65 years of age, whichever is earlier

  • Reappointment: Not allowed

Functions of CIC

  • Adjudicates complaints and appeals under the RTI Act.

  • Ensures transparency and accountability in public authorities.

  • Has powers of a civil court while inquiring into complaints.

  • Can impose penalties on Public Information Officers (PIOs).

Removal of CIC and Information Commissioners

Authority for Removal

  • The President of India has the power to remove:

    • Chief Information Commissioner

    • Any Information Commissioner

Grounds for Removal Without Supreme Court Reference

The President may remove the CIC or IC if:

  1. Declared insolvent

  2. Convicted of an offence involving moral turpitude

    • Determination made by the President

  3. Engages in paid employment

    • Outside official duties

  4. Mental or physical infirmity

    • President forms the opinion that the person is unfit to continue

  5. Acquires financial or other interests

    • Likely to prejudicially affect official functions

Removal on Grounds of Proven Misbehavior or Incapacity

Special Procedure

  • If removal is sought on grounds of:

    • Proven misbehavior, or

    • Incapacity

Then:

  1. President must refer the matter to the Supreme Court

  2. Supreme Court conducts an inquiry

  3. If the Supreme Court:

    • Confirms the grounds, and

    • Advises removal

  4. President can remove the CIC or IC

If the Supreme Court finds the charges proved and recommends removal, the President must act accordingly.

This process ensures independence of the Commission and protection from arbitrary executive action.

Prelims Practice MCQ

Q. The President of India must refer the matter to the Supreme Court before removing the Chief Information Commissioner if the removal is sought on which of the following grounds?

  1. Insolvency

  2. Proven misbehavior

  3. Incapacity

  4. Engagement in paid employment outside official duties

Select the correct answer using the code below:

(a) 2 and 3 only
(b) 1, 2 and 3
(c) 2 only
(d) 1, 3 and 4

Correct answer: (a)

Explanation

  • Supreme Court reference is mandatory only for:

    • ✔ Proven misbehavior

    • ✔ Incapacity

  • Insolvency and paid employment → Direct removal by President, no SC inquiry.

Q. Consider the following statements regarding the removal of Information Commissioners:

  1. The President can remove an Information Commissioner for acquiring financial interests prejudicial to official duties.

  2. Removal on grounds of moral turpitude conviction requires prior approval of the Supreme Court.

  3. Mental or physical infirmity can be a ground for removal.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

(a) 1 and 3 only
(b) 1 only
(c) 2 and 3 only
(d) 1, 2 and 3

Correct answer: (a)

Explanation

  • Statement 1 ✔ Correct: Explicit ground under RTI Act.

  • Statement 2 ❌ Incorrect: SC approval not required for moral turpitude.

  • Statement 3 ✔ Correct: Mental/physical infirmity is a valid ground.



← Back to list