CarpeDiem IAS • CarpeDiem IAS • CarpeDiem IAS •

Right to Vote in India – Legal Status Explained

22 Jul 2025 GS 2 Polity
Right to Vote in India – Legal Status Explained Click to view full image

Right to Vote in India 

Constitutional Provision

  • Article 326 of the Indian Constitution provides for universal adult franchise:

    • Every citizen of India, 18 years or above, not disqualified under the Constitution or any law, is entitled to be registered as a voter.

    • Current AffairsThis article is the constitutional source of the right to vote.


Types of Rights 

Type of RightDescription
Natural RightsInherent and inalienable (e.g., right to life); not directly enforceable unless part of fundamental rights.
Fundamental Rights Enshrined in Part III of the Constitution; enforceable under Article 32 (e.g., right to equality).
Constitutional RightsProvided under the Constitution outside Part III (e.g., Article 300A – Right to property). Enforceable under Article 226.
Statutory (Legal) RightsCreated by legislation (e.g., MGNREGA, NFSA); enforceable via statutory processes. Right to vote is classified here (2023 anup banarwal case).

Legal Framework

  • Article 326: Grants voting rights to every citizen aged 18+ unless disqualified by law.

  • RP Act, 1950: Defines voter eligibility (Sections 16 and 19).

  • RP Act, 1951 (Section 62): Grants the right to vote to those listed in electoral rolls, excluding disqualified or imprisoned individuals.

  • Governed by:

    • Representation of the People Act, 1950

      • Section 16: Disqualifies non-citizens from voter roll.

      • Section 19: Voter must be 18 years old and ordinarily resident.

    • Representation of the People Act, 1951

      • Section 62: Right to vote for every person whose name is in the electoral roll.

        • Cannot vote if disqualified or in prison.


Judicial Interpretations & Landmark Cases

CaseVerdict
N.P. Ponnuswami (1952)SC held right to vote is a statutory right, not a fundamental or natural right.
Jyoti Basu case (1982)Reiterated that voting is not a fundamental or common law right, but a statutory right.
PUCL case (2003)Justice P.V. Reddy: Though not fundamental, right to vote is a constitutional right.
Kuldip Nayar case (2006)Constitution Bench reaffirmed that the right to vote is only a statutory right.
Raj Bala case (2015)Division Bench relied on PUCL, held that voting is a constitutional right.
Anoop Baranwal case (2023)Majority view: Right to vote is only a statutory rightreiterated the judgment in the Kuldip Nayar case.

Dissenting Opinion – Justice Ajay Rastogi (Anoop Baranwal Case, 2023)

  • Held that:

    • Voting expresses citizen choice, integral to freedom of expression under Article 19(1)(a).

    • Free and fair elections are part of the basic structure.

    • Even if not fundamental, voting is derived from Article 326 and shaped by law.

    • Recommended the Supreme Court consider elevating the right to vote to a constitutional right.


Current Legal Status

As per prevailing jurisprudence (majority in Anoop Baranwal, 2023), the right to vote in India is a statutory right, not a fundamental or constitutional right — though it has constitutional origin in Article 326.


UPSC Mains Value Addition

  • Mention Article 326, Sections 16 & 19 of RP Act, 1950, Section 62 of RP Act, 1951.

  • Use landmark cases (especially N.P. Ponnuswami, Kuldip Nayar, PUCL, Anoop Baranwal).

  • Quote Justice Ajay Rastogi’s dissent for nuanced answers on electoral democracy, basic structure doctrine, or Article 19.


UPSC PRELIMS (PYQ 2017)

Raj Bala case (2015)Division Bench relied on PUCL, held that voting is a constitutional right.



← Back to list